-
Website
http://cynicsparty.com -
Original page
http://cynicsparty.com/2008/09/16/cp-commenter-strike-enters-second-day/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Tommmcatt_Interrupted
32 comments · 1 points
-
CheapBoy
10 comments · 1 points
-
KurtGodel
31 comments · 1 points
-
SanFranLefty
58 comments · 4 points
-
nabisco
14 comments · 1 points
-
-
Popular Threads
But at the end of the day, whatever it takes for you to gerry-rig this hooptie. Is Wordpress punishing us for not clicking on the "Is Sarah Palin the Messiah" adbots on the side?
P.S. I think the avatars automatically linked to gravatar. I didn't do anything on my side to make Nancy P appear.
If you're talking about forgiveness, I've heard it's a great thing to forgive even if the wrongdoer doesn't apologize. Personally, I'm not able to forgive people who don't acknowledge the error of their ways. And it's not good for me. But like I said, it's supposed to work wonders if you are able to forgive those who fucked you over.
If you're asking if you should stay with him, I have no answer. This is your call, your life, your special set of circumstances. Yeah. Life. Yay.
Biology be dammed. Men are not monkeys. I've passed up plenty of tail to be faithful to the Mr., and trust me, about 70 percent of my day is spent lusting after something small, muscular, warm and tight. If I can control my enormous, ape-like libido then other guys can as well.
Forgive when you are able - mostly because it will take a lot of the pressure out of the "getting over it" part for you and thus will hurt a little less- but never, ever forget. I've been in all kinds of relationships, both open, and closed and it's my experience that somebody that will betray the basic agreements of a relationship never really were able constitutionally to adhere to them in the first place.
Never let a scorpion sting you twice. I can't council you as to getting back with this person, if that is even in question,but I can tell you that if you do, you will be betrayed again. Maybe not in a sexual way, but frankly, either a person has honor or does not, and on some level you will get burnt on the fundamentals. People that cheat do so because they are selfish and dishonorable, and at 25 or 35 or 55 if they have not developed the ability to honor their commitments will never do so. This is probably why you may be having trouble understanding the cheating: You honor your commitments, and cannot conceive of something that would keep you from doing that.
@jaime sommers: Forgot for the moment that you are an Astros fan. I could provide you with a nice politician apology, but I am real busy right now and thus cannot string together the requisite amount of weasel-words and thus will simply and humbly apologize for that remark.
(And, yes -- Cubbies / Dodgers would be good. I think we can safely slot them in at this point (they get three against Pittsburgh, three against Sandy Eggo, and six against the Giants, while Arizona has three against the Giants, six against Colorado, and four against St. Louis with 4.5 games to make up), and it would be a Divisional Series -- which the Cubs have been known to inexplicably blow.)
(Also: No D-backs in the playoffs, with the White Sox and Cubs, in all likelihood, in the playoffs? Take that, Geezer.)
Ah, how I love that McCain. And by "Love" I mean "Lust After" and by "McCain" I mean "Hot, Hot B.D. Wong". If I may, please (and by "If I may, please" I mean "Since you don't get a say in it anyway"), I will go back over all the comments I have made on this site when the data base is repaired (by which, of course, I mean that I will make Nojo do it) and explain ("completely redefine") anything that may have made me look stupid or like McCain ("senile").
English is fun, particularly when you get to go back and change the meaning of words to suit your purpose.
Power to the Fundamentals("workers")!
In my defense:
1) I work for a (cough) brokerage firm—though one that hasn’t been directly affected at all by what’s going on, thank the FSM—and we’ve been a little, uh, busy.
2) My boss up and went to South Africa for three weeks leaving me a six-mile-looooonnnngg laundry list of “honey do” chores.
3) I’m re-roofing and painting my house in preparation for Seattle’s upcoming monsoon season.
And
d) I’ve been paralyzed with fear and anger whenever I read the political news about how Grampy Psychogeezer and that horrifying, Caribou-murdering wingnut lady are gonna make sure we’re all nuked over and over and over again until Jayzus comes back forever and ever and most Americans are sucking down that shit sandwich and begging for more.
Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit horse-tranqulizers. How’ve you been?
No news from the server geeks, although They've Been Notified. Greg and I tried installing a nifty WordPress plug-in that would allow me to Fix the Damn Database Indexes myself (I'm presuming that's where the problem is), but it wouldn't load. (I don't have Deep Geek server access, so I'm analyzing this through gauze.)
It seems the Will of the Room is to switch the comments back to tried and (mostly) true, presuming we can get the functionality restored. So I'll hold off posting Stupid Disqus Tricks for now.
no doubt. my cats are still so traumatized, they have attached themselves to me, literally. i have to wear padding in this heat, with attached animals while i scrape mold.
still waiting for your weigh in on my email poll yesterday re Xmr, asshole.
or we can discuss cheating right here.
prommy once said, "can't a successful guy get a little strange once in a while without jeopardizing a solid long term commitment, like the french?"
and pedo shed light when he added with two men, indiscretions are more understood and forgivable. thoughts?
I don't know about the rest of America, but my first homoseckshul explosion was caused by a Scott Bakula shirtless scene on Quantum Leap..
hehehe...hot Trek Sex. I was more of a Wesley Crusher man myself....
catt, i'm hanging on by my broken finger nails, but someone said, 'it's getting better all the time'. thanks sweetie.
flippen, i sent nojo pics of the animals to die for. hope he posts them
Presuming we do get the old comments working again, any preferences? Disqus has some goodies that WordPress comments don't -- but I don't see a way to link replies like we enjoy. (And I'm amazed that everyone got their avatars up so quickly.)
I like the rating thing, but only because I am a secret fascist. Also the little comment window thingie that pops up when you hold the cursor over someone's screenname.
Otherwise it is slow and poopy.
@SFL: I think we should chip in for the electronic equivalent of duct tape. Reminds me of the days when I drove an avocado green 1979 Chevrolet Caprice: the original Powered by Hope (TM). Hope that I would be able to make it home. 10 mpg, but gas was like .79/gallon or something.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/...
On the other hand, you get those spy tools everyone's been wanting. And I can probably fix the "Recent Comments" list...
So, cast yer votes, folks. Right now this is all we got, but presumably I'll be able to revive the old database sooner or later. Given a choice, which way to go?
Heretics? Gallows!
Infidels? Gallows!
Democrats? Gallows!
Praise, you assholes!
i see your death touch and raise you the salaries of oil execs.
i got rature morons at masada, riding a camel looking for ARK oil, and my re-united critters that will make everyone say, awwwwwww.
(i'll keep the island devastation shots til everyone settles down)
stop your whining, anyone else be washing their hair in the ocean today??
prommy, take a pill. now.
In other news, Talibunny is for smaller government, unless it comes to an Alaskan creamery (and this is coming from the Murdoch-owned Wall Street Journal). I leave the floor open for double entendres.
By the way: Geezer, fundamentals, strong. Like wow. Pick -- six for Black Eagle (especially considering the new ad up this morning).
Yah, I second that. Nojo is God, the end, KTHXBYE!
dad just told me people are selling out like the bank scene in 'it's a wonderful life'
love that movie.
oh except for evil Mr. Potter the banker.
In a very small way it does feel good to see the sharks suddenly realize they're chum, too. I won't be screaming this from rooftop to rooftop though because the entire world is going to be taking a bite of this shit sandwich.
Now, I'll stay chained to the state as long as I can to reach the 10-year vestment mark so I'll at least have a few hundred bucks to buy pork & beans when I'm 64. Or 72. Or 80.
Target is now selling Domo-Kuns. Dammit, I was once so hip and ahead of the curve, but now I have been mass-marketed.
They still make Ken-L-Ration?
@Nojo: Disqus is a lot slower. And I may have accidentally "rated" your comment when I was trying to hit reply
@Trotsky Ewalda: Good to see you, sorry about the interviews. Gmail me, seriously.
@Lux: My favorite antiquarian book dealer! Hey you!
I need a hug.
Queries to all:
1) Is this more reason not to vote for him because so many people are now chained to Crackberries?
2) If Barack Obama is being ageist and doesn't honor veterans when he says that the broken-armed Psychogeezer doesn't use email, how does PG invent the Crackberry when the little keys are so much smaller and closer together?
3) is this the Democrats' "Al Gore invented the Internet" retribution moment? Pounce, Dems, pounce!!
Oh, wait, I have to register? Oh for fucksake. Will try this and then do the register thing later.
That's it.
THE COMMENTS FUCKING SUCK!
THE COMMENTS FUCKING SUCK!
THE COMMENTS FUCKING SUCK!
THE COMMENTS FUCKING SUCK!
THE COMMENTS FUCKING SUCK!
THE COMMENTS FUCKING SUCK!
(but I always hated"Nabisco"...thanks a lot Brand W)
just yours suck, just yours.
Fuck you.
Love,
Jamie
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/...
Wheee!
Oh, and as if ripped from the Onion, McCain acknowledges Wall Street crisis, admits he's old.
So were the hamsters let go in the Wall Street blood bath? I thought I saw some members of order rodenta on CNN yesterday wearing sweatshirts with the names of Eastern colleges carrying little boxes of stuff out of their work places.
http://alexanderchee.net/2008/09/13/on-being-el...
Will be back in SF in Feb. of 2009 for the ABAA fair. Passes will be forthcoming.
http://www.seattlebookfair.com/
@IanJ. Posts to you always distract...as my name is Ian Jonas...
hey! i was a bryn mawr mom! (jnov too!)
why didn't we get a sweatshirt!
HUG HUG HUG xoxo!
Awwww, thanks. How are you anyways, sweetheart?
I like the old system better. I am a crotchety conservative in all ways (except politically).
http://www.santafenewmexican.com/SantaFeNorther...
I've heard of "homosexual menace," but a "homosexual explosion?" Is al-Gayda attacking America now?
I'll show you a homosexual explosion....
(sorry, couldn't resist!)
Let me be perfectly clear about the cheating thing: If Mr. 'Catt (and by that I mean me OR my partner) was going to cheat, he had better pack his stuff up and move out first, because if he didn't he would come home to a pile of it in the front yard, burning.
...Sam Jones in Playgirl circa 1981.
In our society it's understood that men are the sexual hunters and women control the sex supply--so when you put two dudes together--there's no one to slam on the brakes. This doesn't apply to everyone, of course, and the key is clear, mutually agreed upon ground-rules if a couple wants to open the relationship. Gay men are in non-traditional relationships anyway, which I'd say makes us more open to considering other arrangements.
Ahhhhh... Flash Gordon...mmmmmmmm...
Yah, totally a WGIWF.
Dudes are always ready for some emotionless orgasming. Chicks have more invested in the possibility of pregnancy, so they are the gate keepers. If chicks had the same sexuality as dudes, then there'd be glory holes in every bar, not just gay bars. There'd be rest stop hetero-jungles, hell, the whole world would be a larry craig stall.
Now am I spouting sexist cliches? I have no idea whats PC anymore, I thought this was all simple evolutionary behaviorism or whatever they call it, the male wants to spread his seed, a win win for him would be to cuckold some other dude and get him to raise his kid. Chicks, on the other hand, don't want their dude running off, so they tend to view this behavior with a less than celebratory attitude.
On the other hand, if a chick has the skills, there's a lot to be said for receiving gifts from a whole harem of men, instead of just one, so chicks have some evolutionary motivation to stray as well.
In the end, fidelity is as often a product of lack of opportunity, and lack of boldness, as it is a product of sheer shimmering virtue. Thats why the law has a formal, recognized evidentiary presumption, that if a chick and a dude have inclination, and opportunity, they will fuck. Period. Its presumed.
Thank God for me I am homely and timid, cause there ain't all that much virtue in the world.
I need a hug too, Tommcatt, And pix of baked's furbabies.
i sent them to tips at cynicsparty. and i'm drinking rum right out of the bottle , how'd ya know?
tell me WHERE to send them!
OA, all makes sense, except one thing.
i don't consider homosexual relationships as 'non traditional'
@ fried,
Please understand that I'm not advocating one partner stepping out without the other's knowledge. But if this does happen, one should evaluate the history with your partner and weigh whether a break-up makes sense emotionally and financially. Long term relationships are complicated, esp when you have so much history with the other person.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/sfgate/deta...
Kitteh Hugs 4 U!!1!!!
just sent them to nojo at cynicsparty.com
is that it? let me know..........
@OA and Prom: This is the reasoning I've always assumed explains why a male gay relationship was more likely to be open. I've heard before that lesbian relationships are less likely than either male gay or hetero couples to involve on-the-side action, which I'm too lazy to go factcheck at the mo but would reinforce that fact that it's much more a gender thing than an orientation thing. It's funny how this affects women now, at least from my perspective with my girlfriends. It seems like we are much less worried about the gatekeeper role in noncommittal situations and are as likely as most men to enjoy one night stands or fuckbuddies without guilt or hangups. But I think most women I know still want and expect sexual exclusivity to go hand-in-hand with emotional exclusivity, so if you're involved you're faithful.
It's beyond karazee, isn't it?
At this point, McPain could go on TeeVee and blubber that "I soweetoddid," and he'd be a national hero. "He's just like me!" squeal the undecideds.
Who cares that his chief cheerleader sez he and his runningmate aren't qualified to run a company, or are totally incompetent for that matter?
Expect McPain/Failin poll numbers to shoot through the roof in 5... 4... 3... 2...
@nojo, fried: I have to board now but will check for kitteh pix from SLC.
I think the reblog button lets you post your comment on another blog -- like cross posting on different blogs maybe?
It's true. Men are just not wired for monogamy. I think a lot of cultures--like those Hell-bound Europeans--have a different perspective and just expect there to be indiscretions over the years.
going out to forage for food.
y'all better be here when i get back.
It probably also helps that in my first real relationship, I was cheated on within a few months, which left me deeply traumatized for weeks (wandering the streets of Edinburgh, crying-type traumatized), and probably permanently damaged that relationship (and potentially my ability to have a good relationship again, but let's not read too much into it here).
I have come very close to being the third party in a cheating situation, although not because I wanted to be -- in both cases, the other person approached me, and in both cases I felt like crap about it (although no actual intercourse took place). To me, emotional cheating is worse than physical cheating.
I'm really sorry that you went through that betrayal.
To answer your question, some people see sex as integral to an exclusive love/commitment/relationship paradigm, while others see it as simply recreation. I was very much of the love/commitment/relationship mindset until my first serious boyfriend kinda had it off with just about everyone (guys and gals) in our circle of acquaintances in college, which basically forced me to re-examine my feelings on the issue.
Please tell me that these were Wesley Crusher pimp-slapping fantasies.
Well, there was spanking involved....
Accepted, my dear. And in the interests of time, I will spare you my 1000 word essay on the FUBAR that was the decision to play those games in Milwaukee.
MILWAUKEE!!!!!!!!!!!
/deep cleansing breaths
I guess I see physical and emotional cheating as different things, although they're both bad in my book. I agree with the general sentiment that breaking the rules of the relationship is the real problem -- cheating can only be defined within the context of the relationship and its expectations.
BTW I just saw that the feds are bailing out AIG. WTF?
Re: cheating--Just to clarify, my belief that our tendencies to cheat vs. not cheat are part of our biological hard-wiring should in no way imply that I believe all men are incapable of being faithful or have an excuse for infidelity. If you said you would be faithful and then are not, you. are. a. fuckwit.